SHAHBAZ AHMAD KHAN versus THE STATE
Sections 302 (b) / 149, 324/149, 460/149, 302/149/120 (b) and 148/149 Counter-Terrorism Act (XXWI of 1997), section 7 evidence special to the five accused in the FI At the time of the incident, an electrician highlighted the victim's mansion in the mansion of the deceased, who had arrested himself in various districts to protect himself from legal consequences. In fact, there is ample indication that he had actually plotted the incident, along with other assailants along with the unlawful assembly, had committed abduction and rioting at the victim's house overnight. But the abuses were revealed and the killings were due to Ummad. In addition to attempting to assassinate the prosecutor's witness, the victim's declaration of the witnesses 'death before his death was completely proved by witnesses' statements that Kalashnikov was armed with a rifle and a gun when the forensic expert. Presence was reportedly brought on record for the incident as prosecutors set out and it was also proved that he, armed with deadly firearms, indiscriminately opened fire on the victim and committed a felony. Was a sitting MNA at that time. The area killed him and the other victim, thus spreading panic overturned the ultimate punishment and the conviction of the accused was maintained in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Tarnol lawyer