FAIZA FIRDOUSE versus GHULAM SABIR
West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 5, Schedule and Section 7 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Preamble Law in Evidence (10 of 1984), Elections 2009 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Review of constitutional application for retrieval of suit articles In addition to displaying a list of dowry articles and documents containing the receipts of the dowry, the husband applied for the exhibition of the documentary evidence submitted by the applicant (wife) which was accepted by the family court and the documents were de-documented. , Both lists and receipts were properly displayed, this is a legal proceeding and jurisdiction. The process is not entirely without the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and the fermentation index, 1984 request to the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. The reasons were recorded during the documents' appearance, which was a completely new dispute where the court reviewed its first order, which was not available. Family Court cannot be exhibited under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, when a document was exhibited by a Family Court, by review of a previous Family Court order which is not altogether illegal and With no jurisdiction, the High Court had the power to set such an order in exercising constitutional jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Kalaswala lawyer