Find a Lawyer

TRADE LINES versus BANK OF PUNJAB

Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Sections 6; 9 and 10 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Sections 12 (2), 151 and AXXVII A, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 and Fourth Shed, Entry No. 28 Constitutional Application Facts The bank's receipt of a banking banking tribunal for the petitioner's effect suit to hide was dismissed after finding the answer seeking an answer and dismissing the case. The defendants filed three petitions, namely, under the Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 and Section 12 (2), and AXXVII A, R1, the CPC Banking Tribunal rejected all the pleadings that the defendants' opinion was that of the Federal Government. The Banking Tribunal had no jurisdiction to admit the case filed by the bank; the accuracy of a provincial corporation was passed by the High Court on 11 11 1996 after such a decision of the law by Messrs. Chenab Cement Products (Private) Ltd. and The case against the Bank Tribunal, Lahore and others (PLD 1996 LA 672), against which the decisions of the Banking Tribunal And orders were passed before it was safe for them. He passed the present decree 23 5 1995 on the basis of the past and closed principles of the transaction, which means that before the decision of the High Court defendants the alternative to filing an appeal under section 9 of the Banking Tribunals Ordinance, 1984 Method that was not filed by the defendants. Not to be attached to the transcript of the reply to show cause notice with the constitutional petition, the facts of the High Court had been hidden from the High Court in relation to extending or not exercising jurisdiction in such reply. The defendants openly approached the court. Did not law firms from Ambela lawyer