Find a Lawyer

SAEEDA versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Under the Articles 12, 9 (5) and 22 Ex. Of the Financial Institution (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001, the Appellant was neither served nor defended except for the Plaintiff. The leave application was neither filed nor appointed by a lawyer. To represent him, his banking court dismissed the request on the ground that the request was made for the application to be filed and by the other defendants that the defendant had also available. The correct appellant had not filed or filed a petition for defense and defense. No lawyer on the petitioner's signature to represent him was appearing in support of the leave request or on the affidavit that no summons was issued to the appellant service through the registered post as the postal verification It appears that he was not living at the address given, Actor served appellant's defendants properly, was completely lacking in competence as appellant was sued for his bail. Is entitled to file a leave application within 10 days, which will be decided in accordance with the provisions of the Banking Court Ordinance 2001 list of advocates from Sanghar lawyer