Find a Lawyer

RASHAD MASIH versus THE STATE

Appreciation of the provisions of Sections 302/319 and 324 at 9.30 pm was not possible in the absence of light by the identity of the accused as there were no street lights on the spot. Joined and it was finally confirmed that the gun was fired by mistake The planned incident of the incident was not murder and the motive for the incident was denial. The co-accused were found innocent, and they were acquitted, denying the prosecution's evidence that the presence of prosecution witnesses on the occasion was suspicious and a defense version. A shooting shot targeted the two victims, presented with the help of medical evidence. The case was of version two and by keeping the version of the accused and prosecuting the case, the defense request seemed more probable and accurate, which was also the result of the investigating witnesses. None of the complainants had any previous hostility to the perpetrators of falsity and neither was any allegation made by the complainant against the Inquirer Officer, on the basis of the evidence, the accused had a case in place of section 2 3192. , Section 2 3192, took place under PPC, the crime of PPC accused was changed to punishment under Section 242424, PPC was reduced from seven years to four years. The accused was a poor man and he or his guardian was not in a position to arrange for payment of compensation in any way, the accused had given his due sentence, against which he was granted bail on bail bail. Was released on The money that was to be paid in twelve installments over a period of three years famous lower court advocate from Chak 46 lawyer