MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus THE STATE
Claims / 324/666 / 777R / 222 Definition of Evidence There was no prior background of enmity between the parties, and the motives presented by the complainant were not proven to be an ocular account because the testimony of the injured prosecutor led to the evidence of the medical evidence. The source confirmed that the co-accused, who was acquitted in the case, was not mentioned as a co-accused in the FIR. But he was caught in the implicit statement and given the benefit of the doubt, no appeal was filed against him by the state or by the complainant against acquittal of the accused and it is alleged that the accused. Was equipped with a firearm and proved that he suffered a firearm injury to the prosecutor. After the PPC prosecution proved its case against the accused, the witnesses who were charged under the circumstances under PPC prosecution were rightly convicted, beyond any doubt, the trial court rightly dismissed them. Was sentenced and sentenced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Chak 4 b c lawyer
