Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN

Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001 Sections 9, 17 and 22 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Defendants' responsibility for their deceased father under the privileged scheme issued by Bank Plots on 30 11 2000 Dismissal has been announced. An attempt was made to pay 20% of the outstanding amount, but it was not accepted by the bank's plaintiff then sued on 21 12 2000 and the court directed them to pay the entire amount in accordance with the terms of the incentive scheme. On what was done. Accordingly, the banking court dismissed the case on the ground that the plaintiffs had not deposited a sum of 20 of in the month of November, 2000, for the benefit of the incentive scheme, the validity of the payments by the plaintiffs themselves. Attempts to retaliate against the plaintiff showed that they had paid the entire amount under the scheme on 21 12 2000, which was fine even before the 31 12000 suit was terminated, in the circumstances Could not be done The affected High Court accepted the appeal and set aside the unidentified verdict and decree jobs for advocates from Shamsabad lawyer