Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus THE STATE

Section 302 Criminal Code (v. 1898), hearing of the value of section 245 evidence, the trial court designated a sentence of sentence under section 249A, CRPC, which was not even available on record. Had proven a crime. The PPC alleged that he was convicted and sentenced under section 202020 because of this, the date of the confession was not spoken without any lawyer and the trial court did not allow him to engage a lawyer. Opportunity was not provided, the trial court dismissed the allegation by showing the wrong date of error. The incident and it did not comply with the provisions of section 243, the CCP State Councilor could not defend the unidentified verdict and the accused's conviction was set aside under the circumstances and the case was set for trial according to law. Was sent to court. law firms from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer