Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZHAR ALIAS AJJA versus THE STATE

The accused, who was clearly named in the FIR, was accused of firing two bullets with a pistol 30 bore, eyewitnesses said in his statement. Were consistent as the statement made by the complainant was sufficient immediately. The accused was charged with assassination, medical evidence declared the eyewitness account completely controversial because it was not the case of the accused that the complainant and other witnesses of the incident had any enmity with him. It is that the complainant, who was also an eyewitness to the incident, was. The deceased's father was not sufficient to refute his testimony, in which case there was no condition to reduce the accused's younger age as the victim was also a young person and complainant against the accused under Section 302, PPC. The only son of the charge was an educated son, in the circumstances clearly established that the participating company was not specifically designated as one of the offenders The supplementary statement of the complainant in the FIR in which the co-accused was Involved, even if the incident was recorded on the same day, had no legal significance as the co-accused complained at the time of the incident. If the complainant was known and the complainant could mention the partner's name in the supplementary statement, he may have mentioned his name in the original FIR as well as the statement of the medical officer who performed the post mortem examination This shows that the injury attributed to the co-accused was also caused by the accused, who was allegedly involved in the prosecution of the deceased. advocates from Jamshoro lawyer