Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY/CHIEF PURCHASE OFFICER, L & DD DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT.OF PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MESSRS NATIONAL AGENCIES

Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 79, 80, OVI, RR 14, 15, O XIV, R1 and O XXVII, R1 suits to declare and maintain a permanent prohibition The question is The defendant had granted immunity from Punjab Government not in his personal capacity but in his personal capacity, but the province was not implemented as a party in this regard and issued notice under section 80. Without a lawsuit, the CPC's written statement filed by the defendants stated that it was merely a comment from the plaintiffs without legal objections and endorsements, O O VI, R 15, Required under CPC, no reasonable matter relating to the various requests of the parties by the trial will be compiled under OXIV, R1. That is, on the basis of the agreement between the parties on the CPC suit, the trial court as well as the appellate court had a legal obligation to see that, under Section 42, the Special Relief Act, 1877, Was able to sustain matters or not. The appellate court failed to pass concurrent decision and passed a decree of section 42 of section 79, 80, O VI, Rr 14, 15, O XIV, R 1, O XXVII, R 1, CPC and the Special Relief Act 1877. Accordingly, the courts were set aside by the High Court, exercising its jurisdiction to review, and the case was remanded for a preliminary decision as per law. list of supreme court advocates from Kashmore lawyer