MUHAMMAD JAMEEL versus KARAM KHAN
Assessment of the truth of the provisions of the 52 & M 52 conversion to the final result of the fact by the courts confirming the certified sale in favor of the defendants, the suit filed by the plaintiffs by the plaintiffs was dismissed and appealed against Was deleted. The trial court's decision and ruling were upheld by the appellate court, which raised the plaintiff's claim that the variation in question was confirmed as a violation of section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. Was gone Were run in accordance with the law and were established by responsible revenue officials who included auxiliary propaganda in favor of mutation, in the latter jurisdiction, which assumed accuracy and in the absence of any strong evidence to be rejected. It could not be lightly removed. Recent findings of fact by both courts refusing to interfere in the absence of any material factual misconduct were indicated by the plaintiff's participating company.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Mangowal lawyer