MAZHAR SHAH ALIAS MUNDRI versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/392/411/34 Testimony of Evidence The complainant has merely seen the victim's body and did not name any of the complainant even though he did not appear in court after going abroad, but F. The IR was proved not only by the prosecution witness who filed the FIR, but also by the other prosecutor's witnesses who accompanied the complainant upon meeting the victim, saying that the prosecution during the court proceedings Other witnesses also gave statements in accordance with the story as given in the FIR. How I was robbed and how the victim was robbed, the evidence from the prosecution's witnesses builds confidence, and no investigations have been suggested as to falsely expel the accused because of Kalashnikov's recovery. They were prosecuted by the facts of Although the prosecution's testimony was a cheap witness, it would not discredit the relationship unless something was brought on the record to indicate that he was falsely accused. Although he said the witness was motivated, he was not endorsed by the report of a forensic scientist. The witness, who took the cell parcel containing the cells, pointed out to the Franzik Science Laboratory that they had in any way been cross-examined by the investigating officer with any kind of tampering or legal evidence. Failure to prove the option failed. Without a reasonable doubt, the trial of the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Raiwind lawyer