Find a Lawyer

FEROZE AKBAR versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 204 TimeTime of Court Act (LXIV of 1976), Section 4 contempt of court by a judicial / administrative officer (registrar of the High Court), disobeying the legal order of the Supreme Court, equating to diminishing dignity. And the authority of the court and the interference with the administration of justice were not given any statement that showed genuine and complete repentance, nor was any affidavit entered into by the plaintiff to the effect that the future. He will not repeat the condition on which he was justified. Such an apology was not genuine, without genuine contempt, but mechanical, which was not enough to deliberately disqualify the claimant from disobedience and disobedience to the Supreme Court orders which he did not admit. Will not accept this person's apology. He considered disobedience and contempt as incompetent apologies, meaning that there should be a confession that the contempt of court and the wheels were apologized for avoiding punishment with contempt, and without any sincere apology. Will not purge a claimant of contempt even if the immoral pardon is sought to show repentance for the conduct / conduct of the claimant for the purpose of least punishing the claimant The diminishing situation would be, the dignity / decoration and authority of the court was to be maintained so that the proceedings / instructions / orders issued were not Abused throughout the country but in the case of disobedience and neglect by any person / authority, the court will not refrain from art in contempt of law for punishing the wrongdoer, the claimant whose list of supreme court advocates from Sanjwal lawyer