Find a Lawyer

AHMAD versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188, dismissed all the preference taken by the accused in reviewing the judgment of the Supreme Court, in which the Supreme Court dismissed it in a comprehensive manner. The evidence was reviewed. While arguing the appeals in the court of Iblis was never raised before the High Court or the Supreme Court, it meant that the said application was rejected on the basis of which it could not be mentioned. Any negative indication can be identified in the memorandum of request for review, although the defendant refused to record his statement regarding the oath, but the defendant filed his statement under section 342, CR PC Can explain the absence. Despite numerous occasions Albi's request was never taken by the accused but in response to the allegations against him, no such request was made by the accused. He did not understand that Albi's request, which had been present with the accused from the very beginning, was wrong in filing the present review petition which was rejected by the trial court. It was never put to work before the High Court or the Supreme Court was intermittently aggravated by the Playboy and was not acceptable, without any substance, and there was no merit in the review application. It was rejected. law firms from Renala Khurd lawyer