Find a Lawyer

FEROZE AKBAR versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 185 (3) and 212 termination of his services and the cancellation of the allotment of public flats to public servants, the petitioner was a civil servant who filed a constitutional petition before the High Court and sent him on 9 Was postponed. 1994, which was affirmed on 6 2 1995 while the petition was heard by the Chief Justice of the High Court on 14 1, 2002 and he dismissed it with a brief order which was given orally on the same date but in written order. The reasons were given on 16 2, 2002, after observing that the order was signed by two judges when the petition was heard by the Chief Justice on 14 May 2002 as per the list filed by the High Court Registrar. That stated that the constitutional application was invalid. On 14 1, 2002, by a Bench headed by the Chief Justice, but the next day the Division Bench left for hearing, as it was heard on 15 1 2002 and decided, however, by a brief order, by the concerned officials. Since the order was erroneous in the history of the decree, the Supreme Court had granted leave of approval for appeal to consider whether the petitioner was heard by the Chief Justice of High Court on 1 st 2002 or no? Whether or not the court heard the hearing only on 151 2002 by a division bench and whether the petitioner's plea that his appeal for termination of his service be pending before the Supreme Court while dismissing this petition The High Court had considered and what would have been the effect if the response to the said petition was affirmative or negative on the wrong decision. best law firms from Moro lawyer