Find a Lawyer

CHIRAGH versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (COLONIES),PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 3 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972, the Proviso West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957, Section R Intra Court of Appeal Maintenance Expressions (original order \ as stated in section 312) means the Law Reform Ordinance 1972). , Importer and Scope The Deputy Commissioner granted the Appellant immunity from legitimate powers against this review but was rejected by the Appeal Commissioner but the Board of Revenue allowed the review filed by the Appellant and the following Authorized orders were separated from the Board of Revenue. In exercise of the jurisdiction of the review under section 8 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957, it was noted that the order passed in the review application was approved on the request made beyond the period prescribed in section 8 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act. was done. In 1957, the same was rejected by the appellate judge of the High Court before the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction. At the same time, the application was approved in the review and the application was dismissed, the appellant raised that since the order passed in the review was the original order, therefore, section 3 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972 The provisions of were not implemented. Section 3 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972 sought to refute the right of appeal, asserting that the order passed by the Board of Revenue, which reviewed the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, which is Of which was a constitutional petition, an order approved by the Deputy Commissioner, which denied the appellant's proprietary rights on the request for review and he online advocate from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer