Find a Lawyer

WAHEED AKBAR versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, HEALTH DEPARTMENT

Provincial Drug Inspector for filing a case against applicants under Section 11 (5) (b) and 19 (6) Drug Rules, 1988, R4 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4 and 199 Constitutional Request. The authority was instructed that the applicants were instructed without proper hearing and without justification, under Section 11 (5) (b) of the Drugs Act, 1976 and R4 under the Provincial Quality Control Board. ) And 19 (6) had the accuracy duty added. () The Drug Rules, 1988, to pass orders with full use of the mind, and not in a mechanical manner, public activists of any kind, equitably, equitably, It was to act as a watchman without discrimination and within the parameters of the law as it was envisaged. Article 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) was the duty of the Provincial Quality Control Board to pass an order after scrutinizing the records previously available, but the void order did not show that the board passed the orders after proper application of the mind. Did. And after examining the record, the board's act reveals that it had merely confronted the inspector, which was not sustainable in the eyes of the law, if the basic order was without legal authority. Constructed super-structures will fall off Constitutional petitions were accepted to some extent the orders passed by the Provincial Quality Control Board were set aside power of attorney advocate Blitang lawyer