MUHAMMAD JUNAID versus THE STATE
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 11/10 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), in the process of issuing sections 561A & 190, the accused faces trial. The accused was not named in the FIR and was neither cleared by the police nor their case presented in Callan No.2. Challan effect The court has sufficient powers that if an accused has any material available against him, the court may ask for it and the court is convinced that he was involved in the crime and that no evidence was present against the accused on the court file. Nor was the prosecution able to gather evidence against him, in which case the High Court had dismissed the order seeking the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Minchanabad lawyer
