Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASIN versus THE STATE

In view of the appreciation of the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/324/452/148/149, the prosecution of the accused persons, who were admitted to the hospital on the same day when the accused and the prosecution witnesses were under treatment, joined for registration. Special request was requested by the accused during the cross-case trial against the complaining party. The injuries to the accused person were suppressed in the FIR, as well as evidence against the accused during the trial. Contains non-factual witnesses and the actual facts are not brought to the record and no one has testified to the unrealistic witnesses. In the independent sources and medical evidence, the version of the prosecution contradicts the SOFAS, which was recovered from the suspects after 20 days without blood stains, and a comparison of the injuries received by the accused and the complainant revealed that 6 The injured suspect suffered further damage and the deceased received a lacerated wound. During the incident raised by the accused in light of the Plaintiff Evolution, the accused injured by the complaining party had clearly shown that the trial court's defense against the facts on the part of the accused's statement was denied. The right was not violated and the rest depended on, and the unlawfully convicted suspect was arrested for the violation. Because of the law, the defendant's statement had to be considered in full prosecution, as he failed to prove his case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt; the trial and the sentence were awarded under trial. best advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer