Find a Lawyer

ZIA GHAFOOR PARACHA versus THE CHAIRMAN BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, RAWALPINDI

Section 11, 12 (1A), 12 (8) (iii), (iv), 15 (6), 20, 21 and 22 of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act 1976 of the employees of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Code of Conduct. Rawalpindi, formally 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 dismissing the applicant who dismissed the constitutional petition, challenged the dismissal order in the constitutional petition stating that the chairman of the board had the government As such there is no authority / jurisdiction to initiate disciplinary proceedings against them. As a controlling authority, it can only be said that the selection of the applicants was withheld because the provisions of Section 12 (1A) of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act 1976 did not disclose that the board was the controlling authority The controlling authority was the only option to suspend an employee. Under section 12 (8) (iii) of the Punjab Board of Int., May make rules relating to the performance and discipline of the officers and other employees of the Board. The Board of Armediate and Secondary Education, Act, 1976 was empowered under section 20 of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act 1976 to constitute a regulation subject to the approval of the Government, but nothing in the record to show it. It was not that the Government / Governing Authority had ever contracted such rules, it was asked to approve it, the rules were, in the absence of any sanction, obliged to look into the law and remove the board chairman from the employees of the board. Could not empower, prosecute against misconduct, fraud and fraud charges Notice the showcase by unzipping it power of attorney advocate Chak Jhumra lawyer