WASIM AKHTAR versus RETURNING OFFICER, UNION COUNCIL NO.62, URBAN 26, GUJRANWALA
Section 14 (c) Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, RR 80, 81 and 82 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Disqualification detected after re-election No retired candidate for the seat of Nazim Was. According to Section 14 (c) of Punjab Local Government Election Ordinance, the 2000 Matric Certificate prepared by the returning candidate at the time of filing the nomination papers, was a fake document in which the Election Tribunal dissolved the entire election. Instructed The direct request from the applicant was that they should have been selected selectively instead of re-bonding. The applicant had failed to prove in the evidence before the Electoral Tribunal that the disqualification of the returning candidate was chosen by the voters even as the applicants themselves knew the facts. Offer a fake certificate of the returning candidate after the election and, unless there is any evidence that he is aware of disqualifying the candidate, casting the votes cast in his favor Should not be considered as such and the constituency had the opportunity to select someone of their choice. The selection of the returning candidate in the case was rejected. There is no evidence available on record that the disqualification of the returning candidate was so infamous that even the constituency could be considered aware of it. The High Court refused to interfere with the order passed by the Election Tribunal. Done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
