Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLX XX, RR 1 and 2 suit temporarily applied for immunity application, dismissal order issued by the trial court, application The petitioner filed an appeal against the trial court's order, granting the petitioner's motion that the court could instruct the Revenue Officer to limit the property and if the alleged violations were found. Should be removed and this limitation report will not be objected to. And accordingly directed the Revenue Officer after the demarcation, the petitioner has made public transgressions and on this report the appellate court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner against the order of the trial court, by the plaintiff. No objection was raised after this report was submitted more than 40 days ago. The Revenue Officer reported the applicant, under the circumstances, could not make any complaint temporarily. The decision on the issue of immunity was to be made after the trial of the parties with the consent of the parties. I was not guilty of any law, and the court could not be called. There was no case of interference of the High Court in exercising its jurisdiction over the applicant's appeal while rejecting any material irregularities in the exercise of his jurisdiction; the review application was dismissed. best advocate from Village Sunder lawyer