NAFEES AHMED versus DEPUTY POSTMASTER GENERAL HYDERABAD
4 and 5 Service Compensation Compulsory retirement The major penalty for termination of employment was the charge on the public servant that a charge sheet was levied on a public servant before the money was misused, but before that the charge sheet was canceled at an early stage. Was gone According to the legal rules, the public servant was again charged with the inquiry officer. In his report, the inquiry officer mentioned that the public servant was not responsible for the large sum of money, but the department rules. Given that, they also cannot be left out of the responsibilities at all. It appeared that the public servant had deposited some money and in this regard the inquiry officer explained that the public servant had been called by his senior officer who had told the government employee that he would not deposit the amount. He will be handed over to a policeman. Things were considered negligent, in part, because he did not inform the top author of the rights of the former chief of department to pay the disputed amount to a civil servant, even though he had acted negligently, but served the civil servant. Given the length, his punishment was very severe; the dismissal of the job was changed from the date of compulsory retirement when he was sentenced to a huge dismissal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
