Find a Lawyer

WASAL KHAN versus INAYAT ULLAH

Sections 145, 146 and 561 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC), in the case of a dispute between applicants / suspects under a proper lease for cancellation of the North West Frontier Province Tenancy Act (XXV of 1950) The defendant / complainant was a tenant, but at the end of the lease period, the defendant filed a complaint against the applicant under section 145, CR PC, without obeying the law to evict the applicant. , Which was dismissed after recording the evidence of the parties' appellate court on appeal, although the order approving the magistrate's order dismissed the complaint. To the extent possible, but ordered to attach suit property under section 146, CRPC, until the order passed by a competent forum on the actual possession of the property on the disputed land. The order passed was not sustainable as the case has not yet been taken over. The property was concerned, the applicant was in possession within the next two months before the magistrate and the breath order. NDent also acknowledged the fact that the applicant's lease had expired. But, for the respondents there was no commencement of proceedings against the applicant under Procurement 555, the proper course of eviction of the applicant as CCPC, was to attach the land of the North West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950 The appeal was given under the order of the Court. Conflict and standing crop auction abolished female advocates from Pishin lawyer