Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Rule 9 (d) and 40 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 The application for rejection of the constitutional application which was filed after the expiry date was rejected by the Commission on reasonable grounds of delay after five months from the expiry date. Applicants and they were not allowed to participate in the interview The applicants submitted their application with the request that they could not submit the applications within the time due to the curfew being implemented in their agency / area after which they received The validity commission had the authority to approve the requests. Applicants' request for closure of time and date and relaxation of rules, especially if there is no such breach in violation of any law, rule or government order. Reasons for non-submission were not extended for reasons not declined. It was the responsibility of the Commission to consider the application. The High Court directed the Commission to consider the applicant's case in light of the rules. n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• SHAFQAT MUNIR v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Education, N.-W.F.P., Peshawar 2013 PLC(CS) 1455
• MUHAMMAD HUZAFA v. AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (PAKISTAN) LTD. 2013 CLD 1470
• Makhdoomzada ABDUL KARIM v. AJAB KHAN 2013 CLC 1471
• MUHAMMAD ZAHOOR v. MUHAMMAD ABID QAYYUM 2013 MLD 1473
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Collector Revenue DCO, D.I. Khan 2013 MLD 1480
• MUHAMMAD ZAHIR v. State 2013 YLR 1483
• Syed MUNAWAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. SAHIB KHAN 2013 CLC 1488
• MEEM BAHADAR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1490

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

female advocates from Shorkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes