The definition of Section 2 (c) (c) convictions of AMD evidence was a routine case in which the accused was repeatedly charged that both parties knew each other well, rejecting the possibility of misidentification. And the misinterpretation was that an innocent person was an extraordinary case for the perpetrator of the incident, two days before the incident, there was a dispute between the victim and the accused. The question of whether the accused was a liar was not raised. The version of the evidence was confirmed by other eyewitnesses, both complainants and said that the other witnesses, too, were at odds with each other. Had fully established their presence at the site of the attack, both said that the defense was searching for witnesses long and combing, but that nothing could be extracted from the defense. Failed. He said that the witnesses who organized the testimony were organized, or that any of the previous motives for making false accusations was enough to disprove their testimony, given the fact that they both belonged to the deceased. Will not And dismissing the accusations of murder before the accused, statements affecting the confidence of witnesses who arrived at the police station could not be called contradictory statements of the prosecution's witnesses, but it was a minor contradiction. It was not fatal to give up. Simple and straightforward
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
