Find a Lawyer

MAKHDOOMZADA ABDUL KARIM versus AJAB KHAN

A. XXXVII, R 2 sum recovery suit was granted conditional leave to defend the appellant, providing bank guarantee with bank guarantee and guarantee of Rs. But he failed to comply with the trial court. There was no alternative but to order the case, and to the extent of the original amount, the order was absolutely valid according to the law and was based on valid legal basis and the well-established appeal was dismissed by the High Court.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• SHER WALI v. State 2013 YLR 1442
• SHAHID v. State 2013 YLR 1453
• SHAFQAT MUNIR v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Education, N.-W.F.P., Peshawar 2013 PLC(CS) 1455
• MUHAMMAD HUZAFA v. AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (PAKISTAN) LTD. 2013 CLD 1470
• MUHAMMAD ZAHOOR v. MUHAMMAD ABID QAYYUM 2013 MLD 1473
• Dr. MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman 2013 PLC(CS) 1477
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Collector Revenue DCO, D.I. Khan 2013 MLD 1480
• MUHAMMAD ZAHIR v. State 2013 YLR 1483

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

criminal advocate from Doltala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes