Find a Lawyer

MIAN NADIR JANG BAHADUR versus MAYOR, METROPOLITAN CORPORATION OF LAHORE

O XIV, R 1 The issue of the formation of the matter was to decide whether the plaintiff had infringed on any of the plaintiff's corporation, but none of the courts below had affirmed the case. Was read out by the trial court after reading the agreement. In favor of the plaintiff, it was executed that the plaintiff was the owner of Thora, who was attached to his shop, while on the same sale case, the appellate court decided the matter otherwise his hearing and consequently the failure of justice, through the record. The requests were made due to false advertising. At the time of trial, the trial court was primarily responsible for the trial court's reflection on the dispute raised in the petitions to settle the correct cases. After that, it was concluded that the actual dispute between the parties was not tried on a judicial decision, and the orders of the courts were fixed by the High Court under the use of their amended jurisdiction so that they could decide. Send it to the trial court for hearing. After a fresh issue arose that the plaintiff had crossed the public road or occupied any land in the authority and provided opportunity for the parties to present evidence on the issue. solicitors from Ziarat lawyer