Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus NOTIFIED OFFICER/ADDLITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REV.), LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE

Section 10 and 11 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Allotment of Constitutional Application Land, cancellation of Additional Settlement Commissioner on Mukti request, after inquiry, more than entitled, was allotted and canceled and ordered that the land be re-occupied. Be given to Mukhtar. The Applicant's Additional Settlement Commissioner's order has been enforced in the Supreme Court that as the applicant / informant claimant, he will be entitled to use the land to the satisfaction of his unsatisfactory P1 units, Retainers prefer the respondents / allies. Regarding their privileges, it is further instructed that if the applicant / informant dissatisfaction units were not satisfied, additional land could be adjusted against such dissatisfaction units as the Settlement Commissioner ordered. That the resumed application should be allotted to the applicant / informant, but this order was challenged by the Allies. The validity order passed by the notification officer for compliance with the High Court order could not have been retained despite the notification of the matter which was accepted in the constitutional application, as the matter was passed in favor of the notification officer in order to pass the order. The Settlement Commissioner was not in good standing. In light of the Supreme Court directive, check if the applicant had unsatisfactory pending units against which he could be allotted land again but this aspect was not handled by the notified officer but the fact is The question cannot be settled by the High Court. It has constitutional jurisdiction, but it is determined by the informed authority order famous lower court advocate from Daharki lawyer