Pakistan Panel Code S 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 185 (3) The requirement was that the identification of the accused at night in the moonlight and torch light was questionable, especially when mentioned in the FIR. The torch was not taken. In the possession of the police; there was a lack of collision in the ocular evidence presented by the witnesses and non-witnesses who were closely related to the victims. That the character attributed to the accused was the same as that of the accused partner and that in the criminal cases of the Supreme Court the evidence laid down for the examination of the evidence was not appreciated on record and the appeal was allowed. Was. To consider such disputes by the Supreme Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
