ANWAR FAROOQ SADOZAI, RESEARCH OFFICER, NATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMISSION versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD
Clause 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 and the appointment of defendants in a service that was terminated and requested the appointment of four persons for the new project. Had to go That no sanitary list was issued by the competent authority at the time of the termination of the project, therefore, the order of appointment of the defendant was based on a misconception of the facts and that in any case, the applicant was not present before the transfer. With the completion of this project, the applicant was renewed on the merit as a Research Officer, with the previous benefits of his previous services, given the experience of senior positions and length of service. And that appointment was made legally. The competent authority and, therefore, the respondents had neither Locus Standi nor challenged their right to challenge the appointment but were retained in the position of Research Officer instead of the Applicant. Azmi had allowed the petitioner to consider such disputes
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
