MUNSHI KHAN versus THE STATE
Sections 2 (2 (b) /, / 4 324 / & 34 and 6 336/34 evidence The eye witnesses, including the complainant and the injured witness, have the full support of each other, as well as the prosecution's case). The purpose of the incident was established immediately in support of the incident. Ocular testimony was not disputed at the court house during the day. An allegation was made that it was alleged that a suspected complaining party Against their own anger, so that the attackers could attack at the same time, and did not equate it with a signal extended by the co-accused. Sentenced the accused may have is maintained in conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer
