Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LIMITED, FAISALABAD versus MESSRS AWAN TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED COMPANY, FAISALABAD

Section 12 (2) Banking Tribunals Ordinance (LVIII of 1984) Section 6 (2) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), section 12 (2) prohibits disclosure of notice due to time keeping aside the ex parte decree On the application made by the appellants (minor defendants) from the 10 days provided under section 6 (2) of the Banks in their publication 12 1995 1995, 15 4 1995 and 13 6 1995 by their mother (the appellant here). Not long after, the appellant was filed on 19 9 1995. The Tribunal Ordinance, 1984 was transferred to the High Court after the Banking Court of Banking Companies (Debt, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Act 1997, after notice, including publication in newspapers, was filed by the Banking Court and appeals. Against the previous party's decree passed. After his non-submission, the appellants filed a subpoena in the High Court Banking Court on the obedience statement of DK's satisfaction and petitioned them to set aside the order on the basis of non-service of notice. Echeri dismissed the request as invalid. Appeals for timely leave were barred from appeals in defense of the case. The limitation limit was passed in the order in which the facts about the appeals were presented, which demanded the court to consider other cases, which were filed only in defense of the notice to the appellant. Was not entitled to withhold the reply of. Appeal in circumstances property advocates from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer