Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AJMAL versus M. SOHAIL

Articles 497 (5) and 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860) Sections 302/109/148/149 Pre-arrest bail, the cancellation of the accused had already been included in the investigation No weapons were recovered during the investigation. There was an opinion of various investigating officers that the accused Chelan's innocence had already been presented after the completion of the investigation. The accused was appearing before the trial court in connection with the case as well as the grievance attached to it. As a perpetrator of the crime, he was suspected to have been accused of misconduct or exempted from bail abuse. Physical custody of the accused was no longer required for interrogation purposes, the reasons for which were not accepted by the trial court against the principles of the pre-arrest bail settlement principles prior to the arrest of the accused. , It had no useful purpose. The request for the cancellation of bail, at trial, was dismissed registration advocate from Dera Bugti lawyer