Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 399/402/324 Anti-Terrorism A (XXVII of 1997), the value of Section 7B evidence was not verified by any other credible evidence. It was alleged that the police party was blind. The firing was alleged, on that occasion not even a vacant was recovered and the prosecution claimed that it was because of sand that the vacant lot could not be found - an incredible sub-inspector of the police who was involved in the case. I told the witnesses that the names of the accused were mentioned by a secret informant who did not know about it before, but they said that the informant was not presented. Or that none of the members of the police party were hurt. Despite the statements of the prosecution witnesses that the accused accused of indiscriminate firing on the police party ocular account contradicted the medical evidence, it seemed that the prosecutor The suspicion was expressed in suspicion while the nature of the crime on the acquitted accused revealed that he did not face the police when he was hurt by the accused, while the prosecution's version was highly suspicious and untrustworthy. The proceedings were not free of any suspicion; on the evidence of the prosecution for the crime of the accused The harassment was unsafe and the trial court convicted the accused and the accused was released soon. immigration advocates from Karachi lawyer