Find a Lawyer

MALIK KHALID MAHMOOD versus THE STATE

Article 1616 AA & 7 517 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 in the application for the superintendence of the car was questioned by the authority in question and the applicant requested from the Franz Science Laboratory claimed that he This car was purchased. The competitor has already given the applicant the registration book, transfer deadline and sales receipt, and since the competitor applicant did not pay the car token tax for the specified period, he has contested for the token approval. The original registration book was handed over to the applicant. The tax and the competing applicant raised the payment within a few days, but did not return the original registration book to the applicant and demanded extra money to hand over the book which the applicant did not accept and in the meantime The Car Authority Judicial Magistrate took control. After considering the facts of the case, it was concluded that the competing applicant has a better case for superintendent's grant. I had the car owner because his name was in the registration book as the owner of the car. And after this book, he also didn't have the allegedly-owned Valedictorian car, which was still in the name of a competitor applicant and was never transferred to applicants. Some documents should be referred to the applicant on the basis of which the applicant claimed that he was genuine, but the competing applicant denied the truth of these documents. Documents I have said that the applicant will not be entitled to have a car spare, especially when there is no case pending against this car. Someone top civil advocates from Rawalpindi lawyer