Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAJAN KHAN versus THE STATE


Section 2302 (b), on the evidence scrutiny, proceeded with the confessional statement of the accused in connection with the confessional statement of the accused and the recovery of the weapons that proved the crime. The defendant's negative confessional statement was recorded 13 days after his arrest, that is, on the last day of his remand, neither the complainant nor his sister-in-law whose name was listed on the FIR were required to file a prosecution case. Was not brought to trial for advocacy. According to the FIR, only the suspect was suspected but he never appeared in the witness box to prove his whereabouts. The defendant's confession did not conform to the confessional statement, medical evidence and was not endorsed by any other independent and credible evidence. Bad in the situation

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Sherani lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.