Find a Lawyer

ZIA ULLAH versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORIST COURT, FAISALABAD

Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 [such as based on the Counter-Terrorism (Amendment) Ordinance (Xenomics of 2001)] and Section 23 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) , Arts 185 (3) The special court ordered the transfer of the accused before the High Court on the sides of the court, transferring the case regularly to the murder of the Advocate of the court and injuring Assistant Sub Inspector Police with firearms. Was rejected, but the High Court accepted his constitutional petition and withdrew the case from the special court. And the same case was passed on to the Sessions Judge, charged with the murder of a lawyer on the side of the court, who was in his bed, in an unlawful, careless and brutal manner, and an Assistant Sub Inspector Fire. He was injured by the fire. The adjudicator was going to court to hear a murder case, while Assistant Sub Inspector Police was filing his statement in a criminal case. The indiscriminate firing resulted in a wave of sensation and panic, which not only created a feeling of insecurity among the public, but also reduced the gravity of the crime as well as the gravity of the crime. The reason for the alleged incident was Jaska. The provisions of section 6 (i) (b), (2) (a) (M) (n) cannot be examined at all within the premises of the court that the alleged incident occurred under the provisions of section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act. Is. In 1997, after recording the statements of six witnesses in the case, the accused filed a constitutional petition requesting constitutional jurisdiction so that the trial could be delayed for a reason known to him. registration advocate from Wazirabad lawyer