Find a Lawyer

NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ

The Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, Section 4 and 21 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 12 and Article 152 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) petitioners requested that the Appellant Court, through the respondents / pre-emptors. The appeal was banned, because the defendant requested that the copy be returned to the place that was not recorded, and when he applied to the copying agency at GG's place, the time was up. This appeal was banned, and respondents request that the copy agency send their request. Giving a certified copy directly to the copywriting agency was contrary to the grant record. And the matter was clearly of partial concern as not only the specific number of measles was left out, but it was requested in the sale deed registered as a selling price instead of Rs 8000 in prayer that the order was Rs 4000. Be approved The court granted the appeal for consideration, saying that the report as PLD 1973 Push 115 and PL D 1973 SC 444 was raised in light of the case. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Tando Jam lawyer