ABDUR REHMAN versus MUSTAQEEM KHAN
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 definition of evidence was not witnessed in any way and was based entirely on circumstantial evidence. The first evidence was that the accused was last seen on the night of the incident and in this connection. The witness statement was recorded about a month and a half later. When the witness examined the first day after the identification of the body, he did not say that the last time the accused could not be seen with the witness regarding the delay of the witness and he In addition to the expulsion, another case allegedly brought the issue of love. When the accused's sister was killed and testified, he disclosed the allegations to the accused, who became angry and avenged upon hearing. The information disclosed by the witness was also confirmed by the defendant's confessional statement that could be believed and proved the motive for the incident, and the more robust and important case is that the suspect's burnt cloth pieces / There was a search for the ashes that he had thrown into a nearby dry well. What was discovered only on the indictment of the accused was a dried-up village where people used to throw trash and such pieces were submerged under the trash, and then traced. Disposal of such blood-stained clothing was another natural situation when the recovery of a shotgun on the suspect's identification from the bottom of the sewer slab was another circumstance that led to the argument that the shotgun was not sent to the specialist. The premise was not good, because by chance there were no vacancies. On the victim
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer