Find a Lawyer

REHANUDDIN versus KHAISTA BOLA

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Testimony of Evidence Ferrari Complainant Suppressed the Real Time of the Incident, which was certainly in the dark of the morning, that anyone could have guessed what the deceased was doing on the side of the road at that time. The scene of the incident was not present at the scene as well as holes / cut marks on the deceased's sweater have been proven by the prosecution as no artifacts of bullets or pellets were found on the shirt at the time of the incident. Had arrived The recovery of the shotgun was useless because the report of a ballistic expert in this regard was negative, in which both the Investigation Officers were illiterate, the entire investigation made by them would be pushed aside, it seems that the first information report is sufficient. Was recorded after consideration and confession. In the circumstances in which it was presented, the Ding Complainant was not present on the occasion when the prosecution case was a gross failure in all aspects, so no conviction could be based solely on the defendant's conviction, however, , Because it was otherwise a weak type of evidence. Of a supportive nature, the trial and the sentence against the accused were set aside by the trial court, and they were acquitted under section 302, PPC. online advocate from Layyah lawyer