UNITED BANK LIMITED versus WAFAQI MOHTASIB (OMBUDSMAN) REGIONAL OFFICE, LAHORE
Arts 9 and 10 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article l99 Constitutional application before the Federal Content Demanding Complainant, after obtaining loan facility from the bank, suffered loss due to flood in September 1988, 3 11 1991 Before filing a complaint, direct the Federal Accountant to remove the food-related losses, to which the Federal Ombudsman made some recommendations to the bank connection that Article 10 (3) of the Establishment Complaint was made on a timely complaint. The Office of the Federal Ombudsman can be filed within three months from the day 1983, on the day the affected person receives notice of the matter in which the complaint factory was affected by the flood in 1988, but he In the stipulated period, neither the forum nor the complaint was filed before the Federal Ombudsman. The Complaint Ombudsman Order, 1983, was explicitly barred from filing three years after the establishment of the Office, which could not be applied by federal content, especially when the deadline was passed. There were no "special circumstances" for similar entertainment later. The defamation order states that the constituent elements of the recreation complaint were not clearly present after the expiry of the limitation, thus, after more than a period of jurisdiction has been granted to the plaintiff. Constitutional jurisdiction may be interfered with by the court. The court accepted the constitutional petition and set aside the defamation order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
