MUHAMMAD KHALID versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, FAISALABAD REGION, FAISALABAD
Articles 9/9/420/686868/7171 Cor Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section Punjab Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 5 1985, R 197 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 There can be no indication of termination of the FIR in the constitutional application. Show that the Additional Director, Anti-Corruption Establishment was barred from conducting a third inquiry which resulted in the filing of Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules 1985 against the accused, which was compiled by the executives and not by the Parliament. It was not compulsory by nature and there were directors. Even if an action was taken in violation of a rule, it would be no room for termination of the FIR as serious allegations were made against the accused. And a preliminary lawsuit was filed against him. For those who required the recording of the evidence, it was necessary to collect the evidence of the Inquiry Officer and the High Court, while stagnation, using its powers under Article 199 of the Can, could not be held on the investigation of the Constitution. The request has been restricted in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
