Find a Lawyer

MAHMUD-UL- HASSAN versus MST. JAMILA FIRDOUS

Sections 42 and 54 of the Special Relief Act 1877 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Declaration and Permanent Prohibition for the free access of two parts of a house, namely, the North and the South. The case was filed after a dispute arose over the applicant's use of the settlement through the Department of Settlement and the case was dismissed by a Lutheran trial court, which the petitioners of the High Court appealed. Petition for leave, on which the Supreme Court appointed a commission to inspect and dispose of the disputed property. To report, the local commission said that both parties could enjoy their own property, both comfortably and without interruption, if the plan shows that the party owned by the northern part If access was granted, B was shown in the scheme, which was handed over to the party in the southern part, the Supreme Court would then remand the case to the High Court so that the High Court after considering the evidence to decide the review. The review request was dismissed on the review request, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal to be considered, Millets High Court had taken into account fully to the Supreme Court in its first order. list of supreme court advocates from Babri Banda lawyer