KHAMISA versus MST. ZAIB ELAHI
Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Case for Protection of Plaintiffs, Applicants' Opinion Situated in Response to Land Purchased by Defendants Was a tenant. The property had a preferential right \ The High Court dismissed the case to the extent of the first defendant and the second defendant to the same extent, because the shares of the two defendants were exclusively for sale. Were placed in agreement and partnership. The sale price was made individually as per the sale agreement, both the defendants' shares were split and they both contributed proportionate to the sale price. The theory taken by the High Court did not demand interference. Refused to allow and excluded applications in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Sangla Hill lawyer
