IJAZ AHMED versus THE STATE
Section 6565A A / / 34/11/11/888 Definition of Evidence Sentencing, Defendant's change did not challenge his conviction but he did not comply with Section 36 365A / 34/11/1111, PPC to Section 3 363 /. 1111 from prayed for change in sentence, both PPC were accused and the complainant was arrested on the spot for no purpose to falsely implicate the accused. His statement was confirmed by two independent and impartial witnesses, who gave a straightforward account, the prosecution prepared a matrix containing fake signatures and one, through the accused, sent a message to the complainant alleging that the accused had been charged. Wanted to kidnap a schoolgirl The record of the ransom was not recorded because the sole prosecution in this regard was the joint confession of the accused before the prosecution witnesses, whose exact words were not stated and which were not admissible in the evidence, the sentence in the sections Was changed Section 6363/11 PP / /, 34, PPC to 5 365A / / 34/111111, PPC while PPC was retained under Section 8 468/3434, conviction of these accused. He was already locked up in prison.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Sikandarabad lawyer