Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HAYAT SALEEM versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH


Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Appeal before delay of Service Tribunal, Authority approves the final monetization proceedings against public servants on 12.12 1999 He was appealed before but the service tribunal did not concede 60 days later with the application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, because of the fox's interpretation of the delay, because the government employee was entitled to fact. Knowing full well, the civil servant failed to satisfy the tribunal on this order. Dated 17.12 1999, received by him on 18 1, 2000, with a delay of one month, the Tribunal rejected the appeal after a time limit. The order of accuracy shows that the service tribunal was justified in rejecting this appeal when the banned Supreme Court refused to grant leave. Appeal in circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Gujranwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.