Find a Lawyer

STATE versus TAJI BIBI

West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960 Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 10, 199 and 185 (3) The preventive detention of the High Court in the Constitutional Petition under the order of the High Court on 8 8 2000 also found that The custody of this law is without legal authority and the maintenance of the Constitution's provisions, openly violating the essential requirements of Section 3 of 1960, and the appropriate compensation for a period of 32 days allowed Rs 5,000 per day. Went, so that the appeal against the order was filed in the Supreme Court. 8,000 was withdrawn by the State Advocate General, who further added to the matter till the expiry of the limits. The request for postponement of the proceedings was appealed to the High Court as the government decided to file a petition with the Supreme Court against the order dated 2-4 2001 (another interim order). The High Court rejected the petition. The admission was directed to appear in court at a later date for clarification of the position, as no further legal action should be taken after the proceedings, when the High Court found that after going through the record, without legal authority Detenio was arrested on the same day, instructing the officer concerned to pay compensation. Or was, before being scattered out of court settlement before the case was to be angry. As not pressured by the Law Officer, the High Court correctly rejected the statement signed by the Advocate General Impeachment Order, which was based on valid and coherent reasons under the principles laid down by the Supreme Court, which made the exception. Was not open for Leave to appeal jobs for advocates from Punch lawyer