AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH THE MANAGER versus SABTAIN SHAH
In accordance with Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Sections 6, 9 and 11, suit for recovery of Rs. 21,56,166, plus any damages, expenses and expenses, the defendant offered to pay an unpaid amount in installments. Exempted from insurance and cushion charges, suit costs and payments. Illegal Damages The Bank was not pleased to waive such charges and pay the installments in installments The Banking Tribunal ordered a suit in the quarterly installments of Rs 16, 76, 806, along with the suit mark markup. By this consent, the defendant may not be allowed to pay a dues in installments. The bank was entitled to mark the date of the decision from the date of trial. And that the banking tribunal denied insurance and pillow charges, damages and suit expenses related to it, that the matter was being dealt with by the consent of the parties, as no evidence was filed in this case. This was because in the end it was not possible to determine the bank appellate court's claim allowing appeal, keeping the unwanted verdict and injunction remanded to the case banking court for its latest decision in accordance with law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
