KHALID MEHMOOD versus COMMISSIONER, SARGODHA
Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, did not appear on the appellant merit on the merit list by appointment, therefore they were not appointed for the post merit list and the appellant was thereby appointed. The objection was made and that the list was prepared by a particular office and that in some appointments some belonged to the same office, therefore, the element of selection and selection appeared in the list and based on that. Used to go , The merit position was determined on the basis of transparency. According to these criteria, candidates who were allotted marks on their annual intelligence reports, written exams and merits, received high marks in the office belonging to a particular office, the choice itself would not be sufficient that either the choice Element or element. Was selected and involved in the selection even if the Appellant's numbers in the written test and interview were brought in at the same time as the selected candidate, the Appellant would not have improved his qualification. Refusing to interfere with the meeting, the appeal was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kurram Agency lawyer